00:25:30	Ingolf Kuss:	I also think that there should not be too many exceptions (otherwise it does not make sense to re-evaluate a module)
00:30:01	vbar:	Should non compliant modules receive a “use at your own risk” note?
00:31:26	Julian Ladisch:	Replying to "Should non compliant..."

What kind of risk?
00:32:57	Jenn Colt:	z39.50 is  pretty important
00:35:17	Tod Olson:	Reacted to "z39.50 is  pretty im..." with 💯
00:35:35	Julian Ladisch:	Replying to "Should non compliant..."

I don't see a need for such a notice. If there are security issues the security team will flag them and a fix will be provided. Other risks don't need a notice.
00:38:22	Tod Olson:	Replying to "z39.50 is  pretty im..."

Z39.50 is still critical for ILL discovery.
00:38:51	Charlotte Whitt:	Reacted to "I don't see a need f..." with 👍
00:38:58	Charlotte Whitt:	Reacted to "z39.50 is  pretty im..." with 💯
00:43:54	Tod Olson:	Must drop, thank you all.
00:49:08	Maccabee Levine:	https://github.com/folio-org/tech-council/blob/master/NEW_MODULE_TECH_EVAL.MD#review