00:16:10	Gerhard, Jeffery:	I'm having so many technical challenges lately and cannot raise my hand! I have a comment when I can get in the queue
00:29:10	Zak Burke (EBSCO):	Clarifying my thinking further as I’ve heard others riff on it: developers can identify technical topics worth of discussion and decision making, but we need additional support to actually make those decisions and to help with prioritization.
00:29:38	Ingolf Kuss:	1-3 days
00:30:26	Craig McNally:	3 full days is a lot of time to fill up, and a significant time investment
00:30:45	Day, Kevin:	3 full days is a lot of time to fill up, and a significant time investment
Yea..that is one of the problems with multi-day.
00:30:56	Ingolf Kuss:	Reacted to "3 full days is a lot..." with 👍
00:34:38	Maccabee Levine:	This is the agenda I referred to: https://sites.google.com/stanford.edu/blacklightsummit2025
00:34:43	Gerhard, Jeffery:	less than a full day is probably also good for time zone differences
00:34:56	Day, Kevin:	Reacted to "less than a full day..." with 👍
00:34:58	Ingolf Kuss:	Reacted to "less than a full day..." with 👍
00:38:31	Zak Burke (EBSCO):	A “constructing a module” workshop would be great for new devs and could help expand the audience of devs across more institutions. Great! But what’s stopping us from doing that now and recording it? At some level, it is not that different than “FOLIO should provide some getting-started-with-development resources”, which isn’t really news. Is our developer community small because our documentation is hard to break into, or, as mentioned previously, is this more a resourcing problem (new institutions contributing new devs, existing institutions contributing documentation) than a documentation problem?
00:41:48	Ingolf Kuss:	Replying to "A “constructing a mo..."

Good question. I am not able to answer it. Maybe this question should be addressed at the institutional level / in the PC ?
00:44:00	Ingolf Kuss:	pre-recorded lectures sound like they can make the conference more productive.
00:44:07	Gerhard, Jeffery:	Different formats would require more or less time and planning. Moderators, schedule management
00:45:41	Day, Kevin:	You could create recording snippets and merge them. Each one focused on a brief topic.
I've seen a lot if linkedin learning training videos do this.
00:45:49	Christie Thomas (she/her):	Reacted to "You could create rec..." with 👍🏼
00:46:28	Ingolf Kuss:	what is a hallway track ?
00:48:36	Maccabee Levine:	Have to run in a minute -- great discussion!
00:49:49	Day, Kevin:	I think some terminology I have heard used for something like the dedicated sessions are "breakout sessions" where the main chat breaks into smaller separate sub-groups.
This works well for large groups and badly for small groups.
00:51:25	Craig McNally:	I have to drop.  Parting thought... apologies if this was already mentioned.  Doing something like lightning talks (15 minutes max) might be a good idea.  Developers may be more willing to participate in something like that as opposed to leading a much longer session requiring more effort/prep/etc.
00:51:49	Gerhard, Jeffery:	Reacted to "I have to drop.  Par..." with 👍🏻
00:52:26	Gerhard, Jeffery:	I guess my big question is about resourcing. This is a big undertaking
00:53:16	Ingolf Kuss:	Reacted to "I have to drop.  Par..." with 👍🏻
00:53:46	Wayne Schneider:	I think the resourcing is mainly people, right?