00:05:41 Laura Daniels: Felix, will you be attending virtually? 00:05:54 Felix Hemme: Yes 00:06:08 Laura Daniels: I will be attending virtually as well 00:06:24 Lloyd Chittenden: Virtual. 00:06:27 Charlotte Whitt: Same will I - only virtually 00:06:28 Natascha Owens (UChicago): I'll be there in-person 00:06:39 Alissa Hafele: I will be there in person 00:09:49 Magda Gad: How will the link for the meeting be shared with us? 00:09:57 Laura Daniels: I just realized I have a conflict at that time (personal, not another session) 00:09:58 Jenn Colt: I’ll be there in person too 00:10:43 Natascha Owens (UChicago): I will be there...I can help check on things (just not sure how well I can trouble-shoot technical issues)! 00:11:01 Laura Daniels: Reacted to "I will be there...I ..." with πŸ™πŸΌ 00:11:38 Laura Daniels: Replying to "I will be there...I ..." the technical issues I remember having in the past were things like needing to turn the microphone on! 00:11:48 Natascha Owens (UChicago): Reacted to "the technical issues..." with πŸ‘ 00:11:56 Magda Gad: Thanks Felix! 00:14:07 Laura Daniels: That also fits with Linked Data issues. 00:14:42 Nancy Lorimer: +1 with Laura. It is a problem we are grappling with. 00:15:19 Lynne Fors: Moving forward with the Heirarchical view of Inventory could be a topic: https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UXPROD-491 00:15:31 Laura Daniels: Reacted to "Moving forward with ..." with πŸ‘πŸΌ 00:15:46 Charlotte Whitt: Reacted to "Moving forward with ..." with πŸ‘πŸΌ 00:15:59 Natascha Owens (UChicago): Reacted to "Moving forward with ..." with πŸ‘πŸΌ 00:16:20 Robert Rendall: Reacted to "Moving forward with ..." with πŸ‘πŸΌ 00:16:32 Vivian Gould: Okay, as it turns out, I am at the local information table all morning on Wednesday, I won't really be available and will also miss the meeting. :( 00:17:03 Lynne Fors: Replying to "Moving forward with ..." THis has been on the wishlist for a very long time 00:17:16 Laura Daniels: Reacted to "Okay, as it turns ou..." with πŸ™ 00:17:38 Charlotte Whitt: Reacted to "THis has been on the..." with πŸ’― 00:20:13 Felix Hemme: Reacted to "Okay, as it turns ou..." with πŸ™ 00:21:00 Sara Colglazier (MHC/5C): There needs to be a better way to browse Holdings records and esp. Item records, esp. when I am searching on those segments, I am doing so for a reason. 00:21:17 Julie Darken: Reacted to "There needs to be a ..." with πŸ‘ 00:21:39 Ryan Tamares - Stanford Law Library: Reacted to "There needs to be a ..." with βž• 00:22:59 Jennifer Eustis: Reacted to "There needs to be a ..." with βž• 00:24:52 Robert Rendall: Reacted to "There needs to be a ..." with πŸ‘ 00:25:47 Lynne Fors: βž• 00:25:58 Lisa M English: yes 00:26:01 Katie Rahman: Yes 00:26:06 Ryan Tamares - Stanford Law Library: Reacted to "βž•" with βž• 00:26:10 Alaina Economus (they/she): Reacted to "βž•" with βž• 00:26:15 Natascha Owens (UChicago): Reacted to "βž•" with βž• 00:26:38 Jenn Colt: Khalilah’s got a conflicting session it looks like 00:29:23 Sara Colglazier (MHC/5C): Isn't there something like this also on the priority list for cross app? 00:30:20 Sara Colglazier (MHC/5C): It is a problem throughout FOLIO! 00:31:39 Lloyd Chittenden: Don't many LCCNs start with three spaces? Is it ok to remove them? 00:32:03 Laura Daniels: Replying to "Don't many LCCNs sta..." I don't think anyone would search for them with the spaces 00:32:17 Lynne Fors: Reacted to "I don't think anyone..." with πŸ’― 00:33:18 Laura Daniels: Replying to "Don't many LCCNs sta..." especially if they were not stored and were stripped out of search terms (which is what I believe we are asking for) 00:35:39 Lloyd Chittenden: Replying to "Don't many LCCNs sta..." They should be ignored in searching, but I think they are officially part of the string, for some bizarre reason. I'll bet LC will want to keep them in their data. 00:35:43 Sara Colglazier (MHC/5C): Will this require a re-indexing, or re-saving, for it to take affect for records that already exist when implemented? 00:36:19 Lynne Fors: Replying to "Don't many LCCNs sta..." I think searching LCCN is normalized 00:36:30 Darby, Kristy L: Replying to "Don't many LCCNs sta..." We (LC) do retain them as "official" but yes -- Lynne is right 00:36:44 Laura Daniels: Replying to "Will this require a ..." any changes to how data are stored requires re-indexing for it to be applied to the existing data (that's my understanding at least) 00:37:18 Sara Colglazier (MHC/5C): Replying to "Will this require a ..." thanks 00:47:20 Laura Daniels: It means this ticket needs updating! 00:48:03 Sara Colglazier (MHC/5C): OK, I guess I needed it stated. Sorry 00:48:17 Vivian Gould: To clarify: While there may be examples of data where the extra spaces are needed or desired, my primary concern is in retrieving data that DOES have the extra spaces. It seems that most of what has been displayed/discussed strips the extra space from searching so there is no way to retrieve the records that DO have the extra spaces. 00:49:12 Vivian Gould: In other words, if I am searching for a record with title "a b" and my search automatically removes the extra space, I will never retrieve the record. 00:49:41 Laura Daniels: I think we're talking about leading and trailing space and space-like characters only? 00:54:11 Lynne Fors: That kind of specific search I would use "[space][space][space]12345" with the quotes. LCCN index search is normalized where the white space is removed. 00:55:02 Vivian Gould: Thank you, Lynne. I chose the LCCN example because that was a real time example. But that is super helpful to know. 01:01:54 Jennifer Eustis: https://folio-org.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/PC/pages/621904018/Product+Council+Topic+Calendar+2025