00:03:04	Linda Turney:	muted?
00:03:23	Felix Hemme:	Not started yet ;
00:03:26	Felix Hemme:	;)
00:03:34	Linda Turney:	Reacted to "Not started yet ;" with 👍
00:03:36	Vivian Gould:	Reacted to "Not started yet ;" with 💯
00:35:49	Laura Daniels:	Thank you for the demo!
00:35:57	Ryan Tamares - Stanford Law Library:	Reacted to "Thank you for the de..." with ➕
00:35:59	Malgorzata Gajkiewicz (MOL):	It looks great! Thank you!
00:42:07	Vivian Gould:	Could a copy of this slide deck be made available? This will make a lot of my customers very happy.
00:43:40	Felix Hemme:	Is the order field also displayed and editable in the item record?
00:43:56	Laura Daniels:	Reacted to "Could a copy of this..." with ➕
00:45:38	Natascha Owens (UChicago):	Has work already been done to fix sorting by enumeration?
00:47:41	Laura Daniels:	A future enhancement I would like to see, related to Natascha's question, would be the ability to use the column sort feature and then save that as the default order
00:47:56	Natascha Owens (UChicago):	Reacted to "A future enhancement..." with ➕
00:48:11	Laura Daniels:	But this is a great start and will be a vast improvement
00:48:22	Jennifer Eustis:	Reacted to "A future enhancement..." with ➕
00:49:42	Laura Daniels:	I would also like the ability to set a different default order (in settings), which might help in some of the situations Sara is outlining
00:50:35	Christine Schultz (EBSCO):	Replying to "Is the order field a..."

Not in this implementation
00:50:49	Felix Hemme:	Reacted to "Not in this implemen..." with 👍
00:54:27	Christine Schultz (EBSCO):	Replying to "Has work already bee..."

No work related to sorting by enumeration is being done as part of this feature. However, we do have the story in the backlog to review requirements
00:56:12	Sara Colglazier (MHC/5C):	If the Order Numbers are going also to show in Locate or even control how they display to the public then that will be really problematic for long serial and periodical runs ...
00:57:16	Vivian Gould:	Replying to "If the Order Numbers..."

I didn't think the order numbers would display, just be respected.
00:57:26	Laura Daniels:	Reacted to "I didn't think the o..." with ➕
00:57:49	Felix Hemme:	Ryan and Christine, You can use the time that we have left today. I think people can read the PC and DI update by themself.
00:58:04	Christine Schultz (EBSCO):	Reacted to "I didn't think the o..." with 💯
00:58:05	Laura Daniels:	Replying to "If the Order Numbers..."

Yes, Vivian's interpretation is what I was thinking also. And we definitely want the new order to display to public.
00:59:39	Laura Daniels:	I like this approach to staff suppress much better
00:59:47	Ryan Taylor:	Reacted to "I like this approach..." with 👍
00:59:54	Laura Daniels:	it will allow individual institutions to use it as needed
01:00:07	Sara Colglazier (MHC/5C):	Replying to "If the Order Numbers..."

Right, respected, so new issue # 1201 for August 8, 2025, will then show to the public after 1200 January 1902--making up dates,
01:00:41	Natascha Owens (UChicago):	Reacted to "No work related to s..." with 👍