00:02:15	Wayne Schneider:	Is the Zoom link in the ics file for the "dedicated discussion" meetings incorrect? When I connected I got the message that the meeting had been ended
00:06:01	Khalilah (EBSCO):	Apologies for the delay.
00:18:33	Craig McNally:	If not the TC, then who?
00:19:49	Shelley Doljack:	Apologies for being late.
00:30:57	Craig McNally:	Early communication looks great on paper, but there are complicating factors...  1. It isn't always clear that a breaking change is needed until you start working on something.  2. When in the release cycle the work is being done may limit the window of opportunity
00:31:16	Marc Johnson:	Reacted to "Early communication …" with 💯
00:34:43	Zak Burke:	Reacted to "Early communication ..." with 💯
00:36:46	Thomas Trutt:	Reacted to "Early communication ..." with 💯
00:36:55	Christie Thomas (she/her):	What is RFC?
00:37:23	Christie Thomas (she/her):	Thank you!
00:37:50	Thomas Trutt:	What constitutes a significant change in this context though?
00:38:01	Craig McNally:	Replying to "What is RFC?"

https://folio-org.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TC/pages/349634561/RFCs+Request+for+Comments
00:39:19	Wayne Schneider:	Does it need to be a policy, or really guidelines or advice as Jenn is saying?
00:39:56	Marc Johnson:	Replying to "Does it need to be a…"
I don’t think there is much practical difference
00:40:15	Wayne Schneider:	Policy suggests enforcement which of course we can't do.
00:40:56	Marc Johnson:	Was it a false sense of urgency (from the team making the breaking changes perspective)?
00:41:02	Marc Johnson:	Reacted to "Policy suggests enfo…" with 👍
00:41:35	Craig McNally:	I think timing was a factor here.  The announcement was made after the changes were made and a PR were opened.  I'm not sure how much it would have helped if the conversation was started earlier, but it sounds like we're advocating for comms as early as possible
00:42:29	Craig McNally:	Maybe that's something worth adjusting in the guidelines/policies...
00:48:23	Marc Johnson:	I think that makes it even more important we make it explicit which team is responsible for what
00:53:07	Craig McNally:	wrt "we" I've been doing that too Marc...  habits
00:53:30	Marc Johnson:	Reacted to "wrt "we" I've been d…" with 👍
00:54:20	Marc Johnson:	Olamide is also correct about the discovery challenge
00:55:58	Craig McNally:	Well both parties are asking for the TC to weigh in on this
00:59:01	Marc Johnson:	Weigh in on whether the change is right or whether the way folks went about it is right?
01:01:54	Zak Burke:	I feel like the request in the PR thread is, “Do I really have to make this decision?” And the answer can be “Sorry but yes, ya gotta deal with it.” That’s not a formal PR review (to Wayne’s point), but is still an endorsement.
01:03:27	Wayne Schneider:	Even if the TC did put out guidelines at some point a timely reminder would seem to do no harm
01:03:45	Khalilah (EBSCO):	Reacted to "Even if the TC did p..." with 👍
01:03:46	Craig McNally:	Reacted to "Even if the TC did p..." with 👍
01:04:12	Khalilah (EBSCO):	If POs can help with communication, please let me know.
01:04:12	Marc Johnson:	Reacted to "Even if the TC did p…" with 👍