WEBVTT

00:05:05.000 --> 00:05:27.000
Um, and might help me keep the dates a little bit better. But I think the rest of the year looked good. So feel free to use this as a reference. I added the link data discovery SIG to April 10th. If you did not catch that in Slack, they reached out to us about a crossover meeting. They were particularly interested in the link data app and its use of discovery.

00:05:27.000 --> 00:05:36.000
But it might be a good opportunity for us to talk about all the different ways we might envision discovery working with data and folio.

00:05:36.000 --> 00:05:54.000
Otherwise, our calendar is rather open and sort of rolling based on the previous discussion. If there is a topic that you would like to cover, we can set a particular date and time for that, or if there are things people already know they want to discuss in future meetings.

00:05:54.000 --> 00:06:07.000
You can directly edit this or ask me to to drop it in. I'd be happy to do that.

00:06:07.000 --> 00:06:08.000
Yeah.

00:06:08.000 --> 00:06:18.000
I wonder. So we have the column notetaker in the Pc. We we simply we are all kind of, you know. It's rolling to all of us are being the note taker.

00:06:18.000 --> 00:06:30.000
But we fill in our own name, so we then coordinate if there's meetings we are not attending. And so maybe we could you could simply ask us.

00:06:30.000 --> 00:06:31.000
Okay.

00:06:31.000 --> 00:06:44.000
Please fill in your name as note taker two, three times this year, and then we are, you know, have that planned for and it's not something you as a convener need to kind of.

00:06:44.000 --> 00:06:48.000
ask us who can do the notes today.

00:06:48.000 --> 00:06:52.000
That sounds like a great plan. Let me add a note to our notes.

00:06:52.000 --> 00:06:59.000
Um, about that. A note to our notes. So.

00:06:59.000 --> 00:07:04.000
in the future. or I'll say.

00:07:04.000 --> 00:07:13.000
Please add your name to a few rows in the note taker column.

00:07:13.000 --> 00:07:22.000
And our calendar. And we can revisit that at our next meeting too and make sure we do. That would help a lot. Sometimes I try to do both, but there are many times where it's just not possible.

00:07:22.000 --> 00:07:27.000
Yeah. Yeah, well, we can help each other. It's…

00:07:27.000 --> 00:07:33.000
Yeah. That's a great, thank you for pointing it out. I had kind of forgotten about that call.

00:07:33.000 --> 00:07:44.000
Um… mentioned the discovery SIG. And maybe if we have time today, we can talk a little bit about that. I just wanted to check in one more time.

00:07:44.000 --> 00:07:50.000
I don't know exactly what our next steps should be with this document.

00:07:50.000 --> 00:08:08.000
I don't feel like we have everyone represented who typically attends Libris is missing from this. I know they're really busy right now. I don't know if… Like, EBSCO has… Any opinions on this, Alvaro, if like there are certain places you would not.

00:08:08.000 --> 00:08:14.000
advocate for your eyes or certain places you would like to use them.

00:08:14.000 --> 00:08:24.000
I know Stanford and Chair VD have filled this out, but I don't want to make assumptions for the whole group based on awesome. I know Tamika filled it out.

00:08:24.000 --> 00:08:29.000
And actually, Nancy, I see you're here now. Hi, I don't know if we're done. I think.

00:08:29.000 --> 00:08:31.000
I think we are, but.

00:08:31.000 --> 00:08:37.000
Oh, I wouldn't… I wanted to check about this.

00:08:37.000 --> 00:08:38.000
Yeah, for sure.

00:08:38.000 --> 00:08:41.000
Okay.

00:08:41.000 --> 00:08:42.000
Yeah,

00:08:42.000 --> 00:08:56.000
One thing we may be in. So, one thing we maybe could discuss in our group is where we envision it to be added in the UI.

00:08:56.000 --> 00:08:57.000
Mm-hmm.

00:08:57.000 --> 00:09:12.000
Because now, and probably the next 5, 8 years. It will only be libraries who are using linked data, who is really interested in. And as long as we don't have these.

00:09:12.000 --> 00:09:28.000
customizable display of the instance record. It probably will make most folio libraries annoyed if suddenly we have so many new data properties.

00:09:28.000 --> 00:09:40.000
in the so but but maybe so maybe we should start talk about.

00:09:40.000 --> 00:09:41.000
Mm-hmm.

00:09:41.000 --> 00:09:51.000
Where can we see it being posted in the UI for as a first phase solution for a solution longer term and.

00:09:51.000 --> 00:09:56.000
Third option could be when we finally have this customizable.

00:09:56.000 --> 00:10:02.000
view where each library can define. I want to see these properties. Don't want to see the rest.

00:10:02.000 --> 00:10:14.000
Yeah. Yeah, that's a great point. It came up with the instant source ID. There are some people like, well, if that's blank, then.

00:10:14.000 --> 00:10:18.000
I don't know, it didn't make sense for everyone. So that's a really great idea.

00:10:18.000 --> 00:10:30.000
Yeah, I mean, part of the instant source ID, too, is it made it so people who had macros and macro express had to redo all their macros. That was the, um, because it was an extra.

00:10:30.000 --> 00:10:33.000
tab set involved.

00:10:33.000 --> 00:10:41.000
Yeah.

00:10:41.000 --> 00:10:58.000
And then I think the next step could be to present it for the MMSIC because they are responsible for the inventory app. And of course we should, yeah.

00:10:58.000 --> 00:11:07.000
Maybe it would be a good idea to have Ryan Taylor informed before we we have a talk with Brian Taylor, who is the PO for.

00:11:07.000 --> 00:11:15.000
for inventory.

00:11:15.000 --> 00:11:22.000
That sounds good. Perhaps I will send one more message.

00:11:22.000 --> 00:11:34.000
to the slack asking if people are invested in this to fill it out, and if… If they don't, then I can just assume that they are… this is not a high priority for them, perhaps.

00:11:34.000 --> 00:11:41.000
Yeah, it would be really good to get Andreas to do it, though.

00:11:41.000 --> 00:11:42.000
Yep.

00:11:42.000 --> 00:11:43.000
Yeah.

00:11:43.000 --> 00:11:44.000
And, of course, all room.

00:11:44.000 --> 00:11:51.000
Yeah. Yeah, but but then tech, Andreas and the the ones who are active in our.

00:11:51.000 --> 00:12:01.000
I was sick if they can. fill it in, or give a reply that not not now.

00:12:01.000 --> 00:12:03.000
And Cornell, I see you're missing. That would be good.

00:12:03.000 --> 00:12:04.000
Oh, okay.

00:12:04.000 --> 00:12:12.000
I actually had… I had started, and then I realized that I'm not convinced we actually have use cases where we want.

00:12:12.000 --> 00:12:19.000
Your eyes, in the instance so I took us out, but gen… Jen, you and I should probably talk about this with

00:12:19.000 --> 00:12:29.000
with the… with a few colleagues, and I don't want it just to be my assumptions.

00:12:29.000 --> 00:12:37.000
That's great. And that's helpful to know too, if it's dropped off.

00:12:37.000 --> 00:12:38.000
There, because didn't you introduce it in the 1st place?

00:12:38.000 --> 00:12:39.000
a priority.

00:12:39.000 --> 00:12:48.000
I did because it was something that others were asking for.

00:12:48.000 --> 00:13:03.000
So, Kelly, you could maybe do a little action menu where we simply list all who has either decided to fill in or not fill in. So then you we can.

00:13:03.000 --> 00:13:07.000
Check it off, and then… It would be quick to see.

00:13:07.000 --> 00:13:11.000
Yeah. Oops.

00:13:11.000 --> 00:13:12.000
when all input. has been edited.

00:13:12.000 --> 00:13:15.000
Yeah, I want to say that, um,

00:13:15.000 --> 00:13:16.000
It's good that you, uh, talked with Ryan.

00:13:16.000 --> 00:13:19.000
Stop.

00:13:19.000 --> 00:13:23.000
Because, um, I listened to LinkedIn that I thought we are.

00:13:23.000 --> 00:13:27.000
naturally, we are using URIs for everything, so…

00:13:27.000 --> 00:13:29.000
Uh, I think he's the one.

00:13:29.000 --> 00:13:33.000
To make a… the call about…

00:13:33.000 --> 00:13:35.000
Inventory.

00:13:35.000 --> 00:13:38.000
In fact, we adapt.

00:13:38.000 --> 00:13:43.000
So, what is happening in inventory, so…

00:13:43.000 --> 00:13:44.000
Yeah.

00:13:44.000 --> 00:13:51.000
Okay.

00:13:51.000 --> 00:13:57.000
I would say, though. even those who are not filling it out.

00:13:57.000 --> 00:14:10.000
I think we should have a note whether they support this idea or not, even if they don't have a use case for their own particular institution at this time.

00:14:10.000 --> 00:14:13.000
Laura.

00:14:13.000 --> 00:14:18.000
I can only speak for myself, not Cornell right now.

00:14:18.000 --> 00:14:19.000
Yeah, I realize, but I mean…

00:14:19.000 --> 00:14:28.000
Um, so… so… but I'm assuming that we… we support it. I… I… I absolutely support it, I just don't want to prioritize

00:14:28.000 --> 00:14:33.000
Um, elements when I… we don't have any use cases.

00:14:33.000 --> 00:14:38.000
But if others have use cases, I absolutely support.

00:14:38.000 --> 00:14:45.000
Right? Okay. And I mean, it would be nice if Cornell could say that if you know.

00:14:45.000 --> 00:14:55.000
and others. I'm not meaning to stick it on you, but but it just seems, um…

00:14:55.000 --> 00:15:03.000
you know, because it is a sort of a major change to inventory in some ways that it would be nice to.

00:15:03.000 --> 00:15:14.000
know if… There are people who, you know, don't see themselves making use of it at this time, but… Understand the reasoning behind it and.

00:15:14.000 --> 00:15:29.000
Therefore, support. the ability of others to do so.

00:15:29.000 --> 00:15:40.000
Cool, that sounds good. And that's helpful. Thank you for thinking about. I just didn't want that doc to.

00:15:40.000 --> 00:15:50.000
vanish in relevance or or not be finished. Any other housekeeping items?

00:15:50.000 --> 00:15:58.000
Before we move into the settings page, and then we have a second item to talk about wolfComm Planning.

00:15:58.000 --> 00:16:02.000
Okay, so I just wanted to check in on this page.

00:16:02.000 --> 00:16:15.000
for… the linked tickets here in the title setting page requirements. I think we were good on the.

00:16:15.000 --> 00:16:24.000
fields being filled in for the most part. I do still see that Marva that is not blue core Marva is empty.

00:16:24.000 --> 00:16:33.000
Maybe that's fine. I don't know exactly who I might nudge to help fill that out, but I added screenshots for.

00:16:33.000 --> 00:16:42.000
The blue core editors and also Senopia, what we're calling Senopia Classic.

00:16:42.000 --> 00:16:47.000
There are screen dumps, I think, missing from. Everyone else. Yeah. So it.

00:16:47.000 --> 00:16:51.000
I will ask ours today, sorry.

00:16:51.000 --> 00:16:55.000
That's okay, no, no, go ahead.

00:16:55.000 --> 00:17:01.000
Oh, no, no, I just wanted to say that we, uh, I will add, uh, from the link data editor today.

00:17:01.000 --> 00:17:02.000
That's not the case.

00:17:02.000 --> 00:17:08.000
Okay, cool. Is there anything else you all need from us for this?

00:17:08.000 --> 00:17:15.000
Document except for the screenshots.

00:17:15.000 --> 00:17:27.000
No. Okay, awesome. Um… yeah, okay, cool. So I'm going to close that. And.

00:17:27.000 --> 00:17:46.000
So the new mockups you have shared, Alvaro. So I see there's still some labels missing. So in which we have in the spreadsheet. So it's not just a duplicate of instance source label, but also.

00:17:46.000 --> 00:17:50.000
We had some some more in in the settings page, if you.

00:17:50.000 --> 00:17:51.000
Okay, okay.

00:17:51.000 --> 00:17:52.000
We'll open it again. Yeah, okay, you will double check. Okay.

00:17:52.000 --> 00:17:55.000
Yeah, yeah, yeah, absolutely.

00:17:55.000 --> 00:17:56.000
I don't know, I will add it.

00:17:56.000 --> 00:17:59.000
Okay. Yeah. Okay, excellent. Thanks.

00:17:59.000 --> 00:18:09.000
Yes, please.

00:18:09.000 --> 00:18:26.000
Okay, great. Super. And then Nancy and I had started talking a little bit about wolfCom planning, and we saw Tiziana, your note that it's also on your mind. So… How do we feel about WolfCon this year? What?

00:18:26.000 --> 00:18:31.000
might we like to do? Um… Can I turn things over to you?

00:18:31.000 --> 00:18:42.000
Actually, I think I'd like to ask first who here has any possibility of going to WolfCon?

00:18:42.000 --> 00:18:43.000
So I hope I'm going that I asked today if I could get it a final confirmation from from Lynn, our CEO.

00:18:43.000 --> 00:18:53.000
implementing.

00:18:53.000 --> 00:18:55.000
I am going to… I'm going to ask…

00:18:55.000 --> 00:18:56.000
Okay.

00:18:56.000 --> 00:19:04.000
for, um, institutional support and offer to pay my travel fare myself and turn it into a…

00:19:04.000 --> 00:19:08.000
vacation afterward. So I am tentative.

00:19:08.000 --> 00:19:11.000
Because it is…

00:19:11.000 --> 00:19:15.000
It's complicated how it gets decided who can and can't go.

00:19:15.000 --> 00:19:16.000
Hmm.

00:19:16.000 --> 00:19:26.000
Well, yeah, trust me, it's complicated. Yes, I'm coming from the West Coast to Europe is also it's.

00:19:26.000 --> 00:19:43.000
It's doubly complicated. I'm hoping Kelly will be going. I think I probably will not. It's not like I don't think both of us can go, because I have other people that have to go. So.

00:19:43.000 --> 00:19:44.000
Hmm.

00:19:44.000 --> 00:19:50.000
I'll go to BitFrame in Europe. You know, that's sort of how.

00:19:50.000 --> 00:19:52.000
Um, Alvaro, are you going to be able to go?

00:19:52.000 --> 00:19:56.000
Yeah, I will possibly be going.

00:19:56.000 --> 00:19:57.000
Yeah.

00:19:57.000 --> 00:20:02.000
Yeah. Okay. Okay, I suspect Andreas will be there.

00:20:02.000 --> 00:20:18.000
Yeah, yeah, that's at least his plan. What I have heard. Andreas is also planning to do a presentation on Libris integration with folio. Now.

00:20:18.000 --> 00:20:30.000
They have, um… This is up and running. So so that presentation will be.

00:20:30.000 --> 00:20:34.000
probably partly also be framed. Relevant.

00:20:34.000 --> 00:20:40.000
Right.

00:20:40.000 --> 00:20:41.000
I want to be presenting, too.

00:20:41.000 --> 00:20:42.000
Great.

00:20:42.000 --> 00:20:44.000
Mm-hmm.

00:20:44.000 --> 00:20:46.000
About the link that I hit on, because…

00:20:46.000 --> 00:20:48.000
Okay.

00:20:48.000 --> 00:20:53.000
by then, we'll have the Trillium version complete, so…

00:20:53.000 --> 00:20:59.000
I don't need to present about that.

00:20:59.000 --> 00:21:00.000
Okay.

00:21:00.000 --> 00:21:09.000
Yeah, I saw your hand, Tiziano. I was pretty sure you were going to be going, but.

00:21:09.000 --> 00:21:15.000
You're going to have a very busy couple months in there.

00:21:15.000 --> 00:21:27.000
It's like all of the things that come up very close together this year. So it's.

00:21:27.000 --> 00:21:32.000
I mean, it's not like I wouldn't like to go to Prague, you know, but.

00:21:32.000 --> 00:21:39.000
I'm not sure we can pull that amount of funding itself.

00:21:39.000 --> 00:21:46.000
as I said, the problem is, if I go, I I prevent some of my staff from going, probably. So it's.

00:21:46.000 --> 00:21:53.000
you know, that's a trade off. Um… Um…

00:21:53.000 --> 00:21:58.000
I was thinking to go also because it's very close to Italy, Prague. So it's.

00:21:58.000 --> 00:22:02.000
Yeah, yeah, you can take the train, right? Yeah.

00:22:02.000 --> 00:22:19.000
So, perhaps not the train is easier to go with a plane, but anyway is very closed. And so yes, my integration was to go. But as company we we were asking.

00:22:19.000 --> 00:22:37.000
if it's good to join the meeting also in another way, for example, as sponsor, because they asked us. So it's for this reason that I underlined this topic in the agenda so that I can try to arrange.

00:22:37.000 --> 00:22:45.000
As a group, or I don't know, as a shared family in another.

00:22:45.000 --> 00:22:57.000
profile, but that is very easy for us this year. So we want to take the occasion of this so close event.

00:22:57.000 --> 00:23:06.000
I was in Prague last week with my daughter, and I have never been there before. It was such a lovely experience.

00:23:06.000 --> 00:23:07.000
Mm-hmm.

00:23:07.000 --> 00:23:11.000
Old, beautiful, very clean, very polite people. It's so awesome. So.

00:23:11.000 --> 00:23:15.000
Okay, okay, okay.

00:23:15.000 --> 00:23:17.000
you know, yeah, it's… Yeah.

00:23:17.000 --> 00:23:24.000
Well, at least I get to go to Barcelona. It's okay.

00:23:24.000 --> 00:23:27.000
We are trying to convince Nancy to come in Prague.

00:23:27.000 --> 00:23:32.000
Yeah.

00:23:32.000 --> 00:23:47.000
Well, you never know. That might turn up. But, um… Okay, so I mean, there there's sort of like there's a critical mass of people that are likely to be there. That's that's kind of.

00:23:47.000 --> 00:24:01.000
So it… Um… Do we want to have, you know, a sort of a working meeting or a.

00:24:01.000 --> 00:24:09.000
you know, brainstorming meeting there when we're actually people are actually in person, or.

00:24:09.000 --> 00:24:15.000
I don't… I think we're probably done with workshops for the moment until we have something further.

00:24:15.000 --> 00:24:23.000
My understanding is that working meetings are discouraged in general.

00:24:23.000 --> 00:24:27.000
Oh, okay. Hmm.

00:24:27.000 --> 00:24:53.000
So if our meeting could be at the end of the conference, it could be then kind of… you know, have a talk of all the individual presentations. And while everything are fresh in mind and inspired by all the new talk we could.

00:24:53.000 --> 00:25:11.000
you know, synthesize it in our context, and. Plan, what is follow-up? So it's… it's not, you know, work meeting, brainstorming, but it is kind of, you know.

00:25:11.000 --> 00:25:22.000
What does our sick make? make out of all of these new information and this brand new status on everything.

00:25:22.000 --> 00:25:24.000
Mm-hmm.

00:25:24.000 --> 00:25:38.000
Mm-hmm. But I mean, a lot of you would. All of you would be having to do some real work during the conference and make sure we get to a number of things.

00:25:38.000 --> 00:25:47.000
But, uh… It would make it good for your your application, Laura, because that can help you.

00:25:47.000 --> 00:25:50.000
that you really would be able to synthesize everything when you got back.

00:25:50.000 --> 00:25:56.000
Unfortunately, a lot of it comes down to who else is going.

00:25:56.000 --> 00:25:57.000
And… and the decision makers are people that, um,

00:25:57.000 --> 00:26:02.000
Yeah, I know, I know, trust me.

00:26:02.000 --> 00:26:12.000
Well, it's neither here nor there, but…

00:26:12.000 --> 00:26:18.000
I believe a panel style is one of the options in the proposal form.

00:26:18.000 --> 00:26:19.000
I got halfway through it starting something for us. And then I thought, I have no idea what I'm filling out yet, actually.

00:26:19.000 --> 00:26:29.000
We'll see.

00:26:29.000 --> 00:26:30.000
And the panel is nice.

00:26:30.000 --> 00:26:33.000
So that's a that's definitely an option.

00:26:33.000 --> 00:26:37.000
Um, if we have some people who are there in person and some who are

00:26:37.000 --> 00:26:44.000
remote, um, we could still have, I think, a productive panel.

00:26:44.000 --> 00:26:49.000
Yeah, last year that worked really well for the Blue Quora talk.

00:26:49.000 --> 00:26:53.000
Yeah, but it's nice to have them in person as much as possible.

00:26:53.000 --> 00:26:54.000
Mm-hmm.

00:26:54.000 --> 00:27:08.000
And I mean… the likelihood with the time zone difference, the likelihood of my being able to say, participate, say, might be low, just because the number of talks I'll have been able to get to.

00:27:08.000 --> 00:27:22.000
Will be greatly, uh… diminished, let's say. But that's okay. The rest of you can do it.

00:27:22.000 --> 00:27:27.000
Um…

00:27:27.000 --> 00:27:37.000
Who knows? Things might change. Anyhow, uh…

00:27:37.000 --> 00:27:43.000
Tiziana, does that help? If we do a panel discussion? Does that help you answer your question?

00:27:43.000 --> 00:27:59.000
Yes, sir. I was thinking, my interest is not to from my side to duplicate a presentation, for example. So not proposing something as.

00:27:59.000 --> 00:28:16.000
Chef family, so something that demo the editor in a session, and after having the meeting with our group. My interest is to have one presentation, one.

00:28:16.000 --> 00:28:25.000
effort that and I prefer to do something with you. So within the group, not as alone.

00:28:25.000 --> 00:28:26.000
Okay.

00:28:26.000 --> 00:28:27.000
Yeah.

00:28:27.000 --> 00:28:40.000
Okay, I think that makes a lot of sense. And I think if we have this panel like this about the conference synthesis, I think also it would be could start with sort of an overview.

00:28:40.000 --> 00:28:45.000
of what the linked open data, the SIG has been doing.

00:28:45.000 --> 00:28:53.000
And what it aims for, you know, kind of thing to, you know, to couch and then, you know, um.

00:28:53.000 --> 00:29:15.000
and maybe even, you know, just sort of a slight discussion of the difficulties of.

00:29:15.000 --> 00:29:16.000
Yeah.

00:29:16.000 --> 00:29:23.000
of… Um, you know… Integrating the markness of folio with linked data. And you know, I mean, the the problems we are trying to. We are. We are looking at. And then you know, then then sort of have a panel, and you know, okay.

00:29:23.000 --> 00:29:38.000
you know, how is the conference, you know, things going on at the conference? Is it, you know, helping or hindering us, or whatever kind of thing make it in terms of our group? Very much so, so we have a bit more of an identity, perhaps?

00:29:38.000 --> 00:29:39.000
Is that what you're thinking, Titiana, in a way?

00:29:39.000 --> 00:29:41.000
Yeah.

00:29:41.000 --> 00:30:01.000
Yes, yes, because in this way we can also have education to shortly demo something, no, or to speak about something. But from our side. But what is important, I think, is to underline as a group which kind of challenge we.

00:30:01.000 --> 00:30:17.000
kind of expectation we have to make better disintegration with polio. So not to stay focused on what, for example, JC at the wharf, how Jcricket works. But okay, we are doing something with ejectric and Folio.

00:30:17.000 --> 00:30:33.000
But which kind of challenges or additional problems we are having in going ahead with the new step to really realize this integration, this full integration?

00:30:33.000 --> 00:30:34.000
So speaking…

00:30:34.000 --> 00:30:41.000
Right. And and why we've been adding the wanting to add these things to inventory that are annoying people slightly.

00:30:41.000 --> 00:30:57.000
Exactly, exactly. So our experience could be just an example of what we are doing. But the focus should be on the group. So what we expect as group, why we are doing this. And so.

00:30:57.000 --> 00:31:06.000
More focus on the whole group. Even if each of them use the experience.

00:31:06.000 --> 00:31:08.000
Exactly.

00:31:08.000 --> 00:31:09.000
Now, now, Laura.

00:31:09.000 --> 00:31:14.000
I don't mean entirely, but I mean we need to be able…

00:31:14.000 --> 00:31:16.000
I'm happy as an equal alternative to Italy.

00:31:16.000 --> 00:31:25.000
An equal alternative, but we also need to be able to create an instance record with mark data, and then get the mark data out of there.

00:31:25.000 --> 00:31:29.000
And or overlay it with something that

00:31:29.000 --> 00:31:31.000
has a different source, you know?

00:31:31.000 --> 00:31:34.000
Exactly, it's not just for linked data.

00:31:34.000 --> 00:31:38.000
But it's one of many.

00:31:38.000 --> 00:31:39.000
Linked data is one of the reasons we need this.

00:31:39.000 --> 00:31:43.000
Hmm.

00:31:43.000 --> 00:31:46.000
And maybe we can find… maybe we can identify allies.

00:31:46.000 --> 00:31:49.000
portfolio to live up. portfolio to live up to its its own description.

00:31:49.000 --> 00:31:56.000
Yeah.

00:31:56.000 --> 00:32:01.000
Well, for it to live up to its own description as format neutral.

00:32:01.000 --> 00:32:03.000
Okay. And…

00:32:03.000 --> 00:32:05.000
There's some other details.

00:32:05.000 --> 00:32:07.000
like, hmm…

00:32:07.000 --> 00:32:09.000
For instance, um…

00:32:09.000 --> 00:32:15.000
In the editor, we plan this year to start implementing items and holdings.

00:32:15.000 --> 00:32:20.000
And that relates to users and circulation and orders.

00:32:20.000 --> 00:32:22.000
So, that's…

00:32:22.000 --> 00:32:24.000
Um, that…

00:32:24.000 --> 00:32:28.000
I guess that would involve a bigger discussion.

00:32:28.000 --> 00:32:31.000
for later, because…

00:32:31.000 --> 00:32:34.000
Um, how do we manage all that?

00:32:34.000 --> 00:32:39.000
We'll be using still XML internally?

00:32:39.000 --> 00:32:42.000
I don't know.

00:32:42.000 --> 00:32:45.000
That's something for the future, I guess.

00:32:45.000 --> 00:32:48.000
like, 6 months?

00:32:48.000 --> 00:32:49.000
Yeah.

00:32:49.000 --> 00:33:02.000
Yeah, that's a good topic idea. Expanded entities. as a challenge. Yeah. Or opportunity. We can decide how we want to frame everything.

00:33:02.000 --> 00:33:04.000
Or do maybe a little bit of both.

00:33:04.000 --> 00:33:05.000
Sorry, is it okay to ask for clarification? I heard holdings and items, but I'm not sure what it means in this context.

00:33:05.000 --> 00:33:10.000
Yeah, exactly.

00:33:10.000 --> 00:33:13.000
Like…

00:33:13.000 --> 00:33:17.000
Um, well, um…

00:33:17.000 --> 00:33:20.000
at least within the… within…

00:33:20.000 --> 00:33:22.000
Uh, the portfolio…

00:33:22.000 --> 00:33:24.000
Specifically, the linked data app.

00:33:24.000 --> 00:33:32.000
Um, so far, currently, um, it manages only works on instances, now it's…

00:33:32.000 --> 00:33:36.000
And, uh, it will be authorities.

00:33:36.000 --> 00:33:39.000
Very soon, but…

00:33:39.000 --> 00:33:41.000
Um…

00:33:41.000 --> 00:33:43.000
Later this year?

00:33:43.000 --> 00:33:45.000
like, the second half?

00:33:45.000 --> 00:33:48.000
We will start, uh…

00:33:48.000 --> 00:33:51.000
Um…

00:33:51.000 --> 00:33:56.000
exploring how to implement items and holdings, meaning, um,

00:33:56.000 --> 00:33:58.000
that if you…

00:33:58.000 --> 00:34:03.000
Uh, have a… an instance to have the…

00:34:03.000 --> 00:34:09.000
the physical version of the instance, like the, um, the actual item in your hand.

00:34:09.000 --> 00:34:13.000
With the barcode and all that.

00:34:13.000 --> 00:34:15.000
And, um, circulation information.

00:34:15.000 --> 00:34:18.000
Um…

00:34:18.000 --> 00:34:23.000
Managed by, uh, linked data.

00:34:23.000 --> 00:34:27.000
So, that's the item part and the holding part.

00:34:27.000 --> 00:34:28.000
is, um…

00:34:28.000 --> 00:34:32.000
Basically, the library, sub-library, or…

00:34:32.000 --> 00:34:35.000
the circulation unit…

00:34:35.000 --> 00:34:43.000
or the collection where that, uh, item belongs to.

00:34:43.000 --> 00:34:44.000
usually it's treated like a location.

00:34:44.000 --> 00:34:47.000
Okay, I get… I'm a noob, I didn't really realize that linked data

00:34:47.000 --> 00:34:52.000
would be involved with things like barcodes and stuff.

00:34:52.000 --> 00:34:55.000
Um, yeah, I mean…

00:34:55.000 --> 00:35:01.000
Uh, since we started implementing B-Prame, B-Prame also

00:35:01.000 --> 00:35:03.000
Uh…

00:35:03.000 --> 00:35:07.000
Uh, also takes care of that part.

00:35:07.000 --> 00:35:13.000
So, yeah, we're implementing the whole model.

00:35:13.000 --> 00:35:22.000
Yeah, I think this is just showing there's also we there are 2 different sort of models of doing it.

00:35:22.000 --> 00:35:23.000
True.

00:35:23.000 --> 00:35:31.000
And it's good to have both around, certainly to so.

00:35:31.000 --> 00:35:40.000
Um, so yeah, it's both both are possible. It's just there's 2 different choices about which way you go. So.

00:35:40.000 --> 00:35:42.000
Yeah, uh, sorry, Nosi.

00:35:42.000 --> 00:35:48.000
Yeah, I also been thinking about that, like,

00:35:48.000 --> 00:35:56.000
We're implementing one, but there should be a way to be able to use more than that.

00:35:56.000 --> 00:35:59.000
Uh… we don't have that solved.

00:35:59.000 --> 00:36:00.000
Yeah.

00:36:00.000 --> 00:36:07.000
Right. Right. And I mean, the big thing is to keep folio as flexible as possible while still working.

00:36:07.000 --> 00:36:21.000
Yeah. Yes.

00:36:21.000 --> 00:36:24.000
So it sounds like.

00:36:24.000 --> 00:36:34.000
Yeah, the panel could. I mean, yeah, I mean, we could also just, you know, talk a little bit about the the the different models of linked data that are that are.

00:36:34.000 --> 00:36:38.000
gelling in folio. Let's say.

00:36:38.000 --> 00:36:40.000
Mm-hmm.

00:36:40.000 --> 00:36:47.000
As part of the intro, and then… you know, we could have sort of a.

00:36:47.000 --> 00:36:54.000
that, and then the panel kind of thing, too.

00:36:54.000 --> 00:36:59.000
to make… to round, to keep it a round sort of meeting kind of thing.

00:36:59.000 --> 00:37:19.000
Yeah, I like this idea. In the previous years we've done very group centric insular work and sharing within each other, but oftentimes I feel like folks ask, Well, what's the link data? Sig working on? And this will be really nice opportunity for people in other Sigs to learn what we've been doing and the direction of the work.

00:37:19.000 --> 00:37:28.000
Give them a chance to ask questions and get excited, and maybe get some new participants, too.

00:37:28.000 --> 00:37:39.000
Sometimes things seem like old hat to me, like, oh, well, we've been talking about this for so long, but if you're not part of these groups, you may not know.

00:37:39.000 --> 00:37:50.000
all these different facets of of the work.

00:37:50.000 --> 00:37:54.000
So in our next meeting, should we start drafting?

00:37:54.000 --> 00:38:00.000
Does anyone know offhand the deadline? I think it's soon 20.

00:38:00.000 --> 00:38:01.000
Yeah.

00:38:01.000 --> 00:38:11.000
Yeah, it's March 25. So so next meeting. Oh, that would be the 17. So we're still in time. But yeah, we should.

00:38:11.000 --> 00:38:12.000
We should, uh, get it.

00:38:12.000 --> 00:38:13.000
Okay.

00:38:13.000 --> 00:38:19.000
Uh, perhaps we can share a Google Doc and we can start working together.

00:38:19.000 --> 00:38:20.000
Sounds great.

00:38:20.000 --> 00:38:28.000
Yeah. And but what we could do in a Google Doc could be maybe to post some of the previous texts. Then we have a little inspiration for.

00:38:28.000 --> 00:38:33.000
Yeah.

00:38:33.000 --> 00:38:35.000
Yeah.

00:38:35.000 --> 00:38:39.000
Yeah.

00:38:39.000 --> 00:38:47.000
Our next meeting. This is something I wanted to check. I have the 24th. It's the second Thursday.

00:38:47.000 --> 00:38:55.000
I'm sorry. The second Tuesday. I'm going to open up the doc so I have it in front of me.

00:38:55.000 --> 00:38:56.000
And the third… So it is the 17th?

00:38:56.000 --> 00:39:08.000
the 3rd Tuesday. No, it's the second Friday and the third Tuesday.

00:39:08.000 --> 00:39:09.000
Yeah, yeah.

00:39:09.000 --> 00:39:14.000
So we meet next on the 17th, actually. Okay. Darn, I'll update this. I thought we had more time.

00:39:14.000 --> 00:39:25.000
Okay. And I'll update the calendar too. Okay, great. That's actually better because it will be fresh in our minds.

00:39:25.000 --> 00:39:29.000
Would someone like to volunteer to make the dock, or I can start it?

00:39:29.000 --> 00:39:35.000
I can do that spreadsheet where we simply put in some previous text. And so, yeah, yeah, I can do that for us.

00:39:35.000 --> 00:39:49.000
Okay. Thank you, Charlotte. That's very helpful. Great.

00:39:49.000 --> 00:39:54.000
Well, I'll give you some input, Kelly. But I am, of course, I won't.

00:39:54.000 --> 00:39:58.000
be at the meeting, and it might be on the meeting on Tuesday.

00:39:58.000 --> 00:40:00.000
Oh, yes, I don't… Okay.

00:40:00.000 --> 00:40:07.000
I could be. I could be. We'll see. My plane is until 5 o'clock in the afternoon, so it's a… Beth.

00:40:07.000 --> 00:40:13.000
Okay. No pressure.

00:40:13.000 --> 00:40:14.000
Yeah, we could see if we could find some time.

00:40:14.000 --> 00:40:17.000
I might be running around a little, so…

00:40:17.000 --> 00:40:19.000
And if.

00:40:19.000 --> 00:40:24.000
Yeah.

00:40:24.000 --> 00:40:27.000
Cool.

00:40:27.000 --> 00:40:40.000
I'm trying to think if there's any other aspects of this conference piece.

00:40:40.000 --> 00:40:47.000
I think that sounds good.

00:40:47.000 --> 00:40:56.000
Are there any other topics or things? We should discuss today.

00:40:56.000 --> 00:40:59.000
Should we end a little early?

00:40:59.000 --> 00:41:05.000
Yes.

00:41:05.000 --> 00:41:06.000
Thank you.

00:41:06.000 --> 00:41:07.000
Yeah, so… Thank you.

00:41:07.000 --> 00:41:08.000
Okay, have a wonderful Friday! And or after Friday.

00:41:08.000 --> 00:41:09.000
You too.

00:41:09.000 --> 00:41:10.000
or end of Friday, or Friday evening to you, those of you there.

00:41:10.000 --> 00:41:11.000
Yeah, we… Yeah, we're…

00:41:11.000 --> 00:41:16.000
Yeah! Friday writ large.

00:41:16.000 --> 00:41:23.000
Hmm. See you, bye.

